Future of Food: Journal on Food

Sustainability of Small Scale Farming in a Mountain Region: Case Study of the Khaling Rai Population of the Solukhumbu, Nepal

VALERIE BURRIS
LIrish Nepalese Educational Trust, 46 Swanbrook Bray County Wicklow, Ireland

The Khaling Rai live in a remote area of the mountain region of Nepal. Subsistence farming is central to their livelihood strategy, the sustainability of which was examined in this study. The sustainable livelihood approach was identified as a suitable theoretical framework to analyse the assets of the Khaling Rai. A baseline study was conducted using indicators to assess the outcome of the livelihood strategies under the three pillars of sustainability – economic, social and environmental. Relationships between key factors were analysed. The outcome showed that farming fulfils their basic need of food security, with self-sufficiency in terms of seeds, organic fertilisers and tools. Agriculture is almost totally non-monitized: crops are grown mainly for household consumption. However, the crux faced by the Khaling Rai community is the need to develop high value cash crops in order to improve their livelihoods while at the same time maintaining food security. Institutional support in this regard was found to be lacking. At the same time there is declining soil fertility and an expanding population, which results in smaller land holdings. The capacity to absorb risk is inhibited by the small size of the resource base and access only to small local markets. A two-pronged approach is recommended. Firstly, the formation of agricultural cooperative associations in the area. Secondly, through them the selection of key personnel to be put forward for training in the adoption of improved low-cost technologies for staple crops and in the introduction of appropriate new cash crops.

Data of the article

First received: 19 September 2014 | Last revision received: 07 January 2015
Accepted: 12 January 2015 | Published online: 12 March 2015
URN nbn:de:hebis:34-2014020344928

References

Aase, T.T., Chapagain, P.S., and Tiwari, P.C. (2013). Innovation as an Expression of Adaptive Capacity to Change in Himalayan Farming. Mountain Research and Development, 33(1). DOI:10.1659/0276-4741-33.1.2

Bebbington, A., (1999). Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analysing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development, 27(12), Great Britain: Pergamon. DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7

Bohle, H. and Adhikari, J. (1998). Rural Livelihoods at Risk: How Nepalese Mountain Farmers Cope with Food Insecurity. Mountain Research and Development, 18(4). USA: United Nations University and International Mountain Society. DOI:102307/3674097

Burli, M., Aw-Hassan, A. and Rachidi, Y.L. (2008). The Importance of Institutions in Mountainous Regions for Accessing Markets. Mountain Research and Development, 28(3/4). DOI:http//dx.doi.org/10.1659/mrd-0877

Carney, D. (2003). Sustainable Livelihood approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change. London: DFID.

Chambers, R. and Conway G.R. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies, Discussion Paper 296. Brighton: IDS Publications.

De Haan, L. and Zoomers A. (2005). Exploring the Frontier of Livelihoods Research. Development and Change, 36(1). Oxford Blackwell Publishing. DOI:10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00401x

Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis-Jones, J. (1999). Poverty, land care, and sustainable livelihoods in hillside and mountain regions. Mountain Research and Development, 19(3), USA: United Nations University and International Mountain Society. URL:http//www.jstor.org/stable/2516424

Farrington, J. (2001). Sustainable livelihoods, rights and the new architecture of aid. Natural Resource Perspectives 69, London: ODI

Government of Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics (2012). Environment statistics of Nepal 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal.

HMG/National Planning Commission (1995). Nepal agriculture perspective plan, Summary document. Kathmandu: HMG/National Planning Commission and Asian Development Bank.

HMG/Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics (1997). Nepal Living Standards Survey Report 1996: Volume 2. Kathmandu, Nepal

HMG/Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics (2004). Nepal Living Standards Survey 2003/04: Volume 2. Kathmandu, Nepal

Hussein, K. (2002). Livelihood approaches compared: A multi-agency review of current practice. ODI: London www.livelihoods.org/info/docs/LAC.pdf

Ives, J.D. (2004). Himalayan Perceptions: Environmental Change and the Well-being of Mountain People. London and New York: Routledge.

Jodha, N.S. (1992). "Mountain Perspective and Sustainability: A Framework for Development Strategies ".In: Jodha, N.S., Banskota, M., and Partap, T. (Eds.): Sustainable Mountain Agriculture, Volume 1: Perspectives and Issues, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

Jodha, N.S. (1997). "Mountain Agriculture ". In: Messerli, B. and Ives, J.D. (Eds.): Mountains of the World: A global Priority. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.

Jodha, N.S. (2000)."Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Development in Mountain Areas: Role of Highland-Lowland Links in the Context of Rapid Globalisation". In: Banskota, M., Papola, T.S., Richter, J. (Eds.): Growth Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Resource Management in the Mountain Areas of South Asia. Feldafing: German Foundation for International Development.

Joshi, B.R. (1992). The Role of Large Ruminants in 'Sustainable Livestock Production in the Mountain Agro-ecosystem of Nepal'. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 105. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.

Kotru, R., Choudhary, D., Fleiner, R., Khadka, M., Phadham, N. and Dhakal, M. (2014). Adapting to climate change for sustainable agribusiness in high mountain watersheds: A case study from Nepal. ICIMOD Working Paper 2014/1. Kathmandu:ICIMOD. http://lib.icimod.org/record/30105/files/HIMALIReport__15.pdf?version=1

Land Resource Mapping Project (1986). Land Utilisation Report. Kathmandu: HMG/Nepal, Topographical Survey Department.

Lindenberg, M. (2002). Measuring Household Security at the Family and Community Level in the Developing World. World Development, 30(2). Great Britain: Pergamon. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X (01)00105-X

Reardon T. and Vosti, S.A. (1995). Links between Rural Poverty and the Environment in Developing Countries: Asset Categories and Investment Poverty. World Development 23 (9). Great Britain: Pergamon. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00061-G

Rieder, P. and Wyder, J. (1997)."Economic and political framework for sustainability of mountain areas". In: Messerli, B. and Ives, J.D. (Eds.): Mountains of the World – A Global Priority. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.

Schild, A. and Sharma, E. (2011). Sustainable Mountain Development Revisited. Mountain Research and Development, 31(3). DOI:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00069.1
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Brighton: IDS Publications.

Upadhyaya, H.K. (2000). "Sustainable Poverty Alleviation and Mountain Development in Nepal: Status, Experience and Strategy". In: Banskota, M., Papola, T.S., Richter, J. (Eds.): Growth, Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Resource Management in the Mountain Areas of South Asia. Feldafing: German Foundation for International Development.

World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2000/200: Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Wymann von Dach, S., Ott, C., Klaey, A. and Stillhardt B. (2006). Will International Pursuit of Millennium Development Goals Alleviate Poverty in Mountains? Mountain Research and Development, 26(1). DOI:10.1659/0276-4741 (2006)026[0004:WIPOTM]2.0.CO;2

Yadav, Y (1992). "Farming Forestry-Livestock Linkages: A Component of Mountain Farmers’ Strategies (Nepal)". In: Jodha, N.S., Banskota, M., and Partap, T. (Eds.): Sustainable Mountain Agriculture, Volume 1: Perspectives and Issues. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

Keywords :

Myanmar High School Students’ Perceptions of College and International Readiness in Western Society

Mark Speckien
Louisiana Tech University
Mark Speckien
Louisiana Tech University
International students are more likely to experience mental health issues and increased stress. Mental health is often surrounded by negative societal stigmas that act as barriers to seeking support and tend to lead to greater mental health concerns. International students tend to seek socioemotional support from other international student peers rather than seeking out counseling services. However, this study shows that LGBTQIA+ international students were less likely to seek socioemotional support from other international student peers due to fear of their sexual orientation being discovered and their families finding out about their identity. This study examines how LGBTQIA+ international students talk about their experiences on and off campus in relations to their socioemotional well-being. Specifically, this study sought to better understand the complexities of LGBTQIA+ students’ identities, and the challenges they faced in terms of their socioemotional well-being. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Keywords : international students, socioemotional well-being, mental health, identity development, intersectionality, LGBTQIA